2008
List Reply-To considered harmful
Mettre l'adresse d'une mailing-list en adresse de réponse systématique est vraiment une très mauvaise idée !
"Reply-To" Munging Still Considered Harmful. Really.
People still using these two documents to debate the issue are wasting everybody's time. The issue was definitively settled in 2001, and Chip won.
MetaSystema.Net: Reply-To Munging Considered Useful
by 1 otherWhile the message is being processed, the list administrator might take advantage of the opportunity to munge some of the message headers. Many list administrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation is also one
2005
"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
by 2 others (via)Some forms of header munging are helpful, such as special loop-detection headers. Others are questionable. Most are ill-advised or dangerous. Many list adminstrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation also is one of the most ill-advised.
1
(4 marks)
