public marks

PUBLIC MARKS from nhoizey with tags harmful & mail

2008

List Reply-To considered harmful

Mettre l'adresse d'une mailing-list en adresse de réponse systématique est vraiment une très mauvaise idée !

"Reply-To" Munging Still Considered Harmful. Really.

People still using these two documents to debate the issue are wasting everybody's time. The issue was definitively settled in 2001, and Chip won.

MetaSystema.Net: Reply-To Munging Considered Useful

by 1 other
While the message is being processed, the list administrator might take advantage of the opportunity to munge some of the message headers. Many list administrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation is also one

2005

"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful

by 2 others (via)
Some forms of header munging are helpful, such as special loop-detection headers. Others are questionable. Most are ill-advised or dangerous. Many list adminstrators want to add a Reply-To header that points back to the list. This transformation also is one of the most ill-advised.

nhoizey's TAGS related to tag harmful

débat +   gp:links +   header +   list +   mail +   mailing-list +   mailman +   munge +   reply +   reply-to +   RFC-822 +   useful +